The Worst Job In The Legal Profession

November 15, 2014 Nemes Legal

No offense to $8 an hour file testimonial tasks, however this listing most likely takes the crown as the worst task in the legal occupation.

Its not that the pay is always even worse though when all is said and done, it nearly surely is its that the task is a scrumptious alcoholic drink of frustrating responsibility and bad public policy. Every day on this job would need the legal representative to struggle to support the standard honest responsibilities owed to a client while incrementally weakening the justice system as a whole. For peanuts. And no advantages.

Seems like enjoyable!

The Legal Watchdog captured this one, and as much as this job description shocks the conscience at very first glance, the real horror creeps up upon you after a couple of minutes when you gradually realize that this sort of listing is exactly where the legal occupation is heading.

The position is an Advocate Counsel gig in Racine County, Wisconsin:

PAY: “$25,000 paid in monthly increments of $2,083.33.”

ADVANTAGES: None. You are an “independent contractor” and “will certainly not receive any Racine County worker benefits.”

EXPENDITURE REPAYMENT: None. “Training, travel costs for training [,] and legal products are not supplied or reimbursed []

TERM: You are obligated for one fiscal year; however, Racine County is not similarly bound. You will “serve at the pleasure of the Racine County Circuit Court judges and the consultation can be terminated at any time, for any reason []

So $25,000 slips into sub-minimum wage territory when you begin working considerably more than 40 hours a week. Will this task require more than 40 hours a week?

WORK: Lawyers may be designated any kind of felony [consisting of homicide], misdemeanor, adolescent, criminal traffic, and probate cases and any other action as the court orders … It is estimated that there will have to do with 70 – 80 tasks in 2015 per lawyer.”

Sweet merciful crap. As The Legal Watchdog puts it:

First, if you want to do an extensive job and not fret about malpractice claims, it is nearly impossible for a brand-new solo to take 80 cases in a year. (Personally, I would never take that numerous cases, even with fourteen years of practice under my belt.) But let’s state that you do take the 80 cases– you are, after all, what Paul Campos calls a special snowflake. Even if you are fortunate enough not to be assigned any serious felonies, and simply five of your 80 clients want to go to trial, and your other 75 appointments go remarkably smoothly, and you never ever have to wait several hours for any of your cases to be called, your pay on a per-hour basis might still easily be driven down to sub-fast-food-level salaries (but without the benefits). Excellent luck paying for your travel, training, legal products, malpractice insurance provider, bar dues, lease, other workplace costs, living expenditures, and your student loans.

Its also a reflection of the brief shrift the public providesoffers to the right to counsel. Simply as sanctimonious headline-grabbers drape themselves in the rhetoric of defending the accused so they can post hoc defend their empirically scandalous record and whine about minor institutional slights, theres genuine violence being done out there to the rights of the implicated and its sponsored by the courts themselves, taking their hint from public antipathy toward budgeting anything for the rights of the indigent.

In fairness, Wisconsin Guv Scott Walker has actually budgeted more money for public defenders. Great for him. Unfortunately, in practice its manifested in more tasks like this one and massively higher spend for administrators who take place to be pals of the guv. This is how Tea Celebration support for public protectors materializes where the rubber fulfills the railroading of accuseds. But its terrific that the Tea Party now has more influence with a popular group lobbying for the rights of the implicated! [1]

Unfortunately, simply when you thought the task was bad enough:

Lastly, do you still believe you can pull this off, brand-new JD and soon-to-be solo professional? Here’s the really trouble: you probably won’t even get the task. The posting states that the task will certainly be granted based upon multiple factors, consisting of whether a lawyer is certified by the state public defender (most likely to manage significant felonies, consisting of homicides), and has “a tested record of high quality work and reliability.”

This pay is meant for veteran specialists. Impressive.

My guidance to anyone considering this job: theres some good 9 to 5 document evaluation work still available.

[1] I take place to concur with Tamaras point that the NACDL must have taken the cash. Thats what charities should do. However its equally essential not to ignore the concerns of those who object to questionable gifts. The reality of charitable offering is buying influence, and with a record of supporting budget reducing and privatization of civil services, theres a lot to fret about in the Koch siblings expanding their influence over the NACDL. Insufficient to state no to cash, but enough to motivate, instead of peaceful, critical dissent in order to stay organizations sincere.

The lawyer job market [The Legal Guard dog]

Earlier: This New Low For Document Review Will Surprise You
Harvard Law Professors Decry Sexual Harassment Policy Dumbly
A High-Dollar Koch Practice: Should Defense Attorney Accept Cash From The Koch Brothers?


Comments are currently closed.